U.S. Term Limits
menu
  • Donate
  • PODCAST
    • Latest Podcast Episodes
    • No Uncertain Terms Podcast Library
  • Get Involved
    • Candidate / Legislator Pledge
      • I am Running for Congress
      • I am Running for State Legislature
    • Supporter petition
    • Collect Petitions
    • Volunteer for USTL
    • Digital Toolkit
    • Get Pledges on Facebook
    • Events
    • State Facebook Pages
    • Take Action on Term Limits Day 2/27
  • Current Actions
    • Contact Your State Legislator
    • Contact your Congress members
    • 2023 Bills in Progress
    • National Call to Action for Term Limits on Congress
  • News
    • USTL Blog Articles
    • No Uncertain Terms Newsletter
    • Term Limits Breaking News Episode Library
    • Press Releases
    • Pledge Press Releases
    • Press Contact
  • Term Limits
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Why Term Limits?
    • Term Limits Research Library
    • USTL Term Limits Resolutions in Congress
    • Historical TL Resolutions in Congress
    • State Term Limits Initiatives Since 2012
    • State legislatures with term limits
    • Governors with term limits
    • Nine of the ten largest U.S. cities have term limits
    • Term Limits Election Results (includes local) Since 2008
    • Term Limits Hall of Fame
  • Article V
    • Term Limits Elected Office Pledge
    • Sign the Supporter Petition
    • About Article V
    • Term Limits Amendment
    • County Resolution On Article V Term Limits Convention (SAMPLE)
    • Model Article V Term Limits Convention Application
    • Progress Map
    • 118th Congress Pledge Signers
    • 2023 A5 State Pledge Signers
  • About
    • Board of Directors
    • Team
    • USTL State Chairs
    • Rense Johnson
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Book a Term Limits Speaker
    • Contact USTL
  • Facts
    • Myth-Busting 101: “Congress Will Never Vote to Term Limit Itself”
    • Term Limits ARE NOT Elections!
    • Lobbyists HATE term limits
    • Dispelling the runaway myth
    • Debunking Myths Against an Article V Convention and Term Limits for Congress
    • Term limits decrease bureaucracy
  • Search
  • More
    • Contact Us
    • SHOP
    • Social Media
    • Archive

Myth-busting 101: Are Elections Term Limits?


April 2, 2014

cost of beating incumbent

By Nicolas Tomboulides

“We have term limits. They’re called elections!”

I’m sure you’ve heard it before. When stale incumbents are confronted with the idea of term limits, they love to trot out this one-liner and accuse term limits supporters of hating democracy. We’re told that elections alone will solve all of government’s ills, if we just give them a chance.

Make no mistake: what you’re hearing is a tactic. The permanent political class — Washington’s interlocking network of lobbyists and corrupt public officials — will stop at nothing to protect the status quo. Long-term members from both parties extort the system for personal gain. They receive lavish perks that most Americans in the private and public sectors never see in their lifetimes. Congress is a sweetheart deal, and the politicians know it. Even with term limits on the table, these insiders will not go quietly into the night.

To understand why elections aren’t term limits, we must first examine the number one determinant of electoral success: money.

On average, incumbents can raise five times as much money as their challengers, amounting to a per-race financial advantage of $588,822. This wouldn’t be a problem if the incumbents worked hard and earned campaign money on merit. Unfortunately, they don’t. Special interest money flows into incumbent coffers purely because a member has filed for re-election, or because they’ve used the aforementioned extortion tactics to shake down a private enterprise.

It adds up. Special interests contribute between 85%-95% of their PAC dollars on average to incumbents, not challengers or open seat candidates. Since 94% of incumbents win re-election, the generosity serves as an investment in favorable treatment down the road. Quid pro quo.

Meanwhile, on the challenger side, candidates have to spend every waking hour begging PACs and members of the community for smaller donations. A well-funded campaign is the only way for an outsider to earn name recognition and the voters’ trust. The Center for Responsive politics estimates the cost of beating a U.S. House incumbent to be $2.5 million. This enormous hurdle keeps most good candidates out of politics.

Many wonder how voters who support term limits could keep re-electing the incumbents they don’t like. On the surface, it’s a paradox, but a closer examination of how elections work provides an explanation. The financial might of incumbents creates a system in which very few citizens can run for office. Even if they’re eminently qualified to serve, they don’t have the connections necessary to successfully challenge a sitting congressman.

This results in having a class of challengers who are, for the most part, not biographically different from the incumbents they oppose. They hail from either big politics, big business or the corrupt nexus between the two. Voters are therefore given the “choice” between the devil they know and the devil they don’t. The lesser of two evils wins, but nothing really changes.

Enter term limits. Congressional term limits honor the right of the people to establish parameters for government service. The 75% of Americans who support them are following in the tradition of those who worked to pass the 22nd amendment, which put term limits on the Presidency.

Term limits shatter the stranglehold that incumbents have on congressional seats. When a long term legislator goes home, he takes his special interest bankroll with him. The result is more competitive, open-seat elections in which all candidates have a fair shot. Data shows that, in rare cases of open seat races, both candidates raise an average total between what incumbents and challengers get today. It’s a happy medium, ideal for legitimate competition.

To answer the age-old question, elections are not term limits. Rather, they are a process that can be improved by term limits. Incumbents would be denied the chance to exploit the system for electoral invincibility. Quality challengers would be given real opportunity, without professional politicians and special interests blocking the door.

Nick Tomboulides is the Executive Director of U.S. Term Limits

Filed Under: Myth Busting 101

  • ABOUT
  • PODCAST
  • BLOG
  • PETITION
  • CONTACT US
  • DONATE
Subscribe to our email list
Copyright © 2023 US Term Limits - All Rights Reserved

by U.S. Term Limits



Privacy Policy
1250 Connecticut Avenue NW Suite 700
Washington, D.C.20036
(202) 261-3532