Term Limits Would End This Madness
By Paul H. Dykes
Approval ratings for Congress are dismal for good reason. Our congress men and women, with few exceptions, are more concerned with their own re-election and shameful party loyalty than they are with the good of the country. Their votes are influenced by how they or their party will be perceived in their re-election campaign, not what’s best for the citizens. Their health insurance and retirement benefits are arrogant and shameful when compared with the general public. AND it is getting worse! Enough already! This madness would disappear with term limits. Our founding fathers intended congress to be one term and out. That way, citizens would come in, focus on the citizens’ best interest, and then return to being a citizen. Congress would not be there long enough to get contaminated. We, the citizens of this United States, must bring this about because congress is not capable of governing themselves.







Comments
Our only recourse is the second line to amendment laid out in Article V of the Constitution. Two thirds of the states must demand a constitutional convention to call for an amendment to limit congressional terms. The other conclusion is the danger that a constitutional convention would lead to other major changes to the Constitution or even a complete rewrite of the document (that is what happened in Philadelphia in 1787). The question we must be willing to address is, are we willing to chance the major changes that might accompany a convention or is the risk to our Constitution and our government too great. Personally, I think not. I am in favor of a convention to address term limits and possibly one or two other issues such as gerrymandering. These are issues that our Founders sort of took for granted. As we have learned, the thirst for power is too great for most politicians to overcome on their own.
— David W. Williams Feb 22, 04:51 PM #
I am willing to support such an initiative. How can I help?
— Linda May 15, 02:52 PM #
The old addage is so true in these elected positions – “Power corrupts & absolute power corrupts absolutely”.
Once electe dthey loose sight of their elected duty & spend all their time & energy getting elected & getting as much PORK as possible to buy votes & favors from their supporters.
“Elected by a majority but elected to serve ALL”.
I’ll give everyone 2 prime reasons for term limits at the congressional level. Robert C. Byrd (elected 9 times in Senate) & EDward M. Kennedy (elected 9 times in Senate). Two additional reasons at the congressional level – JOhn D, Dingell – (elected 27 timesin the House of Rep.) & John Conyers – (elected 22 times in House of Rep.).
If it is good enoiugh for the president, many Governors & some Mayors then why not for ALL elected officials. Think of all the money saved in retirement and health insurance, PLUS much more time spent doing the people’s business instead of campaigning, PLUS a major reduction in PORK & pay-off.
— Charles Checkley May 28, 01:20 AM #
— Bill Lewis Jun 10, 06:58 PM #
— Bob Peterson Jul 28, 05:22 PM #
I, the undersigned, believe Members of Congress should be limited to three terms in office.
That’s it. Go here to sign (it only takes a minute):
http://www.termlimits.org/content.asp?admin=Y&contentid=28
Or click on link on right hand side of main site: www.termlimits.org
Please forward to everyone on your email lists. Polls show that nearly everyone—including Democrats, Republicans and Independents—support term limits. Try it, you’ll find even your apolitical friends will be eager to sign on.
“Rotation in office and the citizen legislator was once an American tradition and, with your help, will be again. Thank you! -Philip Blumel, president U.S. Term Limits, www.termlimits.org
— George Blumel Aug 10, 12:05 AM #