Citizens for Term Limits

Mitt Romney's Word is No Good

by Rense Johnson, Chairman, Citizens for Term Limits

Oklahoma Republicans remember how how presidential candidate Mitt Romney reneged on his promise to speak to their 2007 state convention at the last minute when it was too late to find a replacement. For details, scroll down from this article to “Did he plan to get by on his looks?” Conclusion: Romney’s word is no good. I’m not a mind reader, but it is easy to wonder if part of his strategy in waiting so late was to be sure that a rival could not then be found who might steal his thunder while he was out doing whatever he thought was more important than the State of Oklahoma. How sad, how bad.

In his Michigan victory speech Mitt ignored President George W. Bush and praised his father, George Herbert Walker Bush. Remember George Herbert Walker Bush? It was he who said “Read my lips: No new taxes.” then raised taxes despite his promise — at the cost of his second term reelection, thus opening the door for Bill Clinton. George Herbert Walker Bush’s word was no good either. Could there be a political promise-breaking contagious disease, a virus, caught by Mitt from GHWB? (I met GHWB in person when he was Vice President, and can say first-hand that I found his manners to be no better than his word. Perhaps the two go hand-in-hand.)

Is there a vaccine available to inoculate politicians from the promise-breaking disease?

Yes there is, but it’s sometimes very hard to find. It’s called truth and integrity.

Americans are tired of dishonest politicians. They are looking for a leader they can trust who means what he says and doesn’t keep his fingers crossed behind his back.


Send this article to my friend(s).

Print this page.

« back to articles index

Comments

  1. I suggest you skip the political sniping and focus on what your web page suggests: TERM LIMITS. It is a very worthy and desperately needed cause. Other than a “contributions” section you show no efforts at real mobilization.
    I also think your limits are too short and impractical. Two terms in the Senate, five in the House make more sense and would still help dampen the nonesense that goes on now.
    If I can be of real help feel free.

    Kind regards
    Doug Hudson
    — Doug Hudson    Feb 13, 06:51 PM    #
  2. Doug Hudson true words, I would go two steps further and have the president elected to one 6 year term thus eliminating the 2 years needed preparing for a second term and campaigning for members of the party in the White House. The second step I advocate is to cap the spending for federal and state offices. It is insane to spend the money that we do to elect people to the state and federal offices. If we can do what is suggested here we can tap the vast talent that exists in this country to help govern the country without having to compromise their values and spend a fortune of contributed money. We need to return the goverment to the people for the people. Let’s do what Doug Hudson suggests, lets mobilize for term limits.
    — Bernard Doherty    May 2, 10:45 AM    #
name Remember
email
http://
Message
  Textile Help